Friday, March 1, 2013

India vs Australia 2013, 2nd Test at Hyderabad — Preview

© IANS

Different approaches, different results and different mindsets heading into Hyderabad would probably best summarise Australia’s tour of India so far. The hosts wiped the dust bowl at Chennai’s MA Chidambaram Stadium clean with their trump card, spin, as Ravichandran Ashwin, Harbhajan Singh and Ravindra Jadeja shared all 20 Australian wickets among themselves. 

Australia, meanwhile, decided to stick to their guns and went with their strength, playing four pace bowlers and just the one specialist spinner in Nathan Lyon. James Pattinson bent his back on a pace-less pitch to justify the strategy as he went on to take a five-wicket haul in the first innings; at the end of the game, he had six of India’s 12 wickets that fell to his name. However, Lyon could manage just four and leaked 200-plus runs in India’s first-innings total of 572. 

In the end, a lead of 192 was too much for the Australians to overcome and set a good enough target for India to chase in the fourth innings. To their credit, rather, to debutant Moises Henriques’s credit, Australia did well to make India bat again and take the match into a fifth day after being at 137 for seven a few minutes after Tea on Day Four.

The pitch at Hyderabad isn’t expected to spit as many cobras as the one at Chennai. Local cricketing hero and recently-turned commentator, VVS Laxman, described it as “hard, firm and crumbling”. You wouldn’t think the Australians would be too ecstatic on hearing this, given Chennai behaved almost the same way. But indications are that Hyderabad would probably not turn right away from Day One, which would make the toss a lottery for whoever wins it.

It is to be seen whether Australia stick to their guts and play four pacers again around Lyon. But given the drubbing they received in Chennai at the hands of India’s spin trio, and how the host batsmen milked runs off their quicks, and spinner for that matter, coach Mickey Arthur would do well to resist the temptation of giving a third Test cap to left-arm spinner Xavier Doherty.

However, playing Doherty would mean leaving out one of Peter Siddle, Pattinson or Mitchell Starc. Henriques is definite to make the cut following his heroics with the bat (68 and 81 not out). Siddle is the most experienced of the lot and would be an automatic choice too. Between Pattinson and Starc, the latter seems most likely to be made the sacrificial kangaroo, since Pattinson was genuinely troubling the Indians. However, the 22-year-old Victorian could just be rested in Hyderabad, since he has recently recuperated from a lower rib injury and tends to break down if he exerts himself a lot.

Doherty is quite similar to India’s chief tormentor in the England defeat at home, Monty Panesar, in the sense both are quick through the air. After seeing how Panesar ran his way through the Indian batting on rank turners just a couple of months ago, playing the 30-year-old could just prove to be the right gamble for Australia.

India, on the other hand, look set to play the same XI come March 2, given they were so successful in Chennai. This means local boy Pragyan Ojha isn't likely to make the cut even in his hometown. Captain MS Dhoni likes the idea of playing two off-spinners, Ashwin and Harbhajan, who get the ball to turn away from Australia's four left-handed batsmen in the top six. Slow left-arm bowler Jadeja, who can also bat, unlike Ojha, provides the variation in the spin arsenal.

As for the batting, the openers’ slot looks the most unsettled, with Virender Sehwag and Murali Vijay sharing 37 runs between them in the two innings at Chennai. Shikhar Dhawan and Ajinkya Rahane are waiting on the sidelines for their opportunity, but Dhoni put his faith in Sehwag and Vijay in the post-match presser, saying the duo need to be given time to settle.

With the selection of the squad for the third and fourth Tests set to take place after the culmination of the Hyderabad rubber, the onus is on Sehwag and Vijay to perform. The rest of the Indian batting looks good enough to stroll their way through this series.

Both teams would love to get a win here. India would get an unassailable lead in the series if they win, whereas Australia will be gunning to do all that’s in their capacity to prevent that from happening and get back on level terms in the four-match series. The Australians hate to lose, wherever in the world they are, and India can expect a strong comeback at the Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium.

Teams:

India (Probable): Virender Sehwag, Murali Vijay, Cheteshwar Pujara, Sachin Tendulkar, Virat Kohli, MS Dhoni (c & wk), Ravindra Jadeja, Ravichandran Ashwin, Harbhajan Singh, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Ishant Sharma.

Australia (Probable): David Warner, Ed Cowan, Phillip Hughes, Shane Watson, Michael Clarke (c), Matthew Wade (wk), Moises Henriques, Peter Siddle, Nathan Lyon, James Pattinson, Xavier Doherty.

(This article first appeared here)

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Tendulkar and Dhoni positives ahead of 2nd Test, Ojha’s exclusion a howler


On a typical Martian Chennai track, India thumped Australia by eight wickets in the first Test to open their account in the four-match Border Gavaskar Trophy. It was a win that everyone associated with and backing Indian cricket was yearning for following a torrid last 22 months. Whitewashes in England and Australia were followed with a humiliating defeat at home against the Englishmen. The win, notched up on February 26, was like a breath of fresh air for Team India.

As the teams gear up for the second Test in Hyderabad, here are the five talking points from the Chennai rubber:

1. 1.2 billion people breathe a sigh of relief as Sachin Tendulkar returns to form:

He may not have got to the magical three figures — something he hasn't done since the January of 2011 — but one could sense that something was on the anvil when Sachin Tendulkar walked out to bat at No 4 on Day Two of the Test, with India wobbling at 12 for two. 

Tendulkar's love affair with Chennai is well documented. The southern Indian city is as good as his second home, with the Little Master having recorded some terrific knocks here in his 24-year career. In the last Test that India played in Chennai, in 2008, Tendulkar's magnificent fourth-innings ton helped India chase down a mammoth 387-run target against the Poms. So, it was obvious to expect loud cheers when James Pattinson bowled Virender Sehwag early in India’s first innings to give Australia their second wicket. Enter the hero.

To say Tendulkar was struggling is an understatement. Ever since he helped India win the World Cup on home soil in April 2011, the runs had dried up faster than a pond in the Sahara. Several experts and pundits opined that the master's technique was faltering and his 39-year-old body creaking. The current series was predicted to be his last by editors in their newspapers in big, bold lettering.

When Sachin Tendulkar settled in at the crease on Day Two of the first Test, you could observe a distinct change in his batting © IANS
But when Tendulkar settled in at the crease on Day Two, you could observe a distinct change. Something was different. His feet were moving swifter than a tap dancer and his body was shaping up to play the shots like clockwork. It was vintage Tendulkar on display as he went on to share 90-run partnerships with Cheteshwar Pujara and Virat Kohli. Just when you thought century no 101 was imminent, Nathan Lyon got the ball to pitch in the rough, take a vicious turn, beat Tendulkar and hit the stumps. He was gone for 81.

However, the innings gives a lot of hope for the remainder of the series. If Tendulkar has a successful stint in the middle in this series, who knows, you might just get to see him make the South Africa tour in November, where his experience will be vital.

2. India’s opening pair — the chink in the batting armour:

India piled on 572 runs in the first innings with Kohli scoring a hundred and skipper Dhoni hitting a spectacular double ton. Tendulkar and Pujara too looked in good touch, although unable to convert into big knocks. If there was one blemish in India's batting card for the first Test, it was right at the top against the two openers.

Virender Sehwag and Murali Vijay scored a combined 37 runs across the two innings, as a result of which Dhoni was showered with questions on whether the team will try a different combination in the next Test. The Indian skipper was, however, unperturbed, and rightly so.

Virender Sehwag has the backing of his captain to come good in the series © IANS
Dhoni said that both the openers need to be given more time and requested everyone to not judge them on the basis of one match. They need to be given the comfort that they are wanted in the team and that their necks are not on the line with a couple of poor innings. As this writer had suggested in an earlier article, the Indian team management and selectors need to give individuals, especially the newcomers, a longer rope to prove themselves. Sehwag and Vijay should ideally open in all four Tests, unless their performances horrid enough to warrant a change. 


3. Dhoni's newfound aggression in the longer format:

Apart from Tendulkar, the other distinct change that was observable within the Indian camp was the approach of Dhoni — towards his captaincy and batting. The 31-year-old had been under a lot of criticism and pressure due to employing a defensive approach in bygone tours, even as recent as the 1-2 defeat to England. But in Chennai, there was a different Dhoni who had walked out leading his team.

MS Dhoni was in his best elements in Chennai © PTI
Dhoni attacked Australia with his three spinners and crowded the on-strike batsman with close-in fielders for long durations. Even when Michael Clarke went on the counter-attack in both innings, Dhoni did not alter his strategy and stuck with an aggressive field. He seemed more involved, more expressive, and more proactive than he was in the last two years. One particular example that comes to mind is when a visibly flustered Dhoni reprimanded Ishant Sharma for not putting in his 100 per cent in trying to effect a run-out.

His 224 from 265 balls at 84.52 with the bat further reinforces this observation. Dhoni went from 97 to 201 in one session in a bid to increase India’s run rate and lead. While he has always been a quick scorer in the limited-overs format, such a brisk, attacking innings was on display in Tests after a long time.

“He has changed a bit from the England series. He is more assertive,” Sunil Gavaskar told NDTV after the match. An assertive captain is perhaps exactly what India need to come good in this series.


4. Why is India’s best spinner warming the bench?

India selected two pacers in the Chennai Test in Ishant Sharma and debutant Bhuvneshwar Kumar. Together, they accounted for only 33 of India’s 226 overs bowled in the Test. Needless to say, the duo went wicketless in the match as the spin trio — Ravichandran Ashwin, Harbhajan Singh and Ravindra Jadeja — shared all 20 wickets among them, with Ashwin getting 12 himself.

So, one could say the move to underbowl the pacers was justified. But then, why select two pacers if you’re not going to use them? And more importantly, why bench your most successful spinner of late, Pragyan Ojha, when you have one of the most spin-friendly pitches in the country at your disposal?

Will Pragyan Ojha play in his hometown Hyderabad? © Getty Images
Ojha’s exclusion from the XI was a major drop-jaw moment on the opening day of the Test. Dhoni justified the move in the post-match presser saying that it made sense to use two off-spinners who would move the ball away from the four left-handers that made up Australia’s top six batsmen. Dhoni also said that Jadeja got the nod to be the variation spinner over fellow left-armer Ojha because the former can bat as well.

All that is well and good, and it must have been a tough call Dhoni and the powers that be would have taken. But sidelining your best spinner — the highest wicket-taker in the England series — was truly a bolt from the blue. With the Hyderabad pitch expected to turn less compared to Chennai, Ojha might, to no fault of his own, find himself missing out again.


5. Australia's bowling conundrum:

Australia's major concern ahead of this series was spin. Yet, they went ahead with four pacers and a lone spinner in the first Test. While skipper Clarke defended his team's call to play to its strength, even as Australia's pacemen took eight out of the 12 Indian wickets that fell in the game, playing just one specialist spinner in Lyon on a crumbling, spitting clay pit was always going to backfire.

Lyon picked up only four victims in the match, and also leaked far too many easy runs. He was targeted by the likes of Tendulkar and Dhoni, who picked his turn with ease. Dhoni himself scored 104 runs out of his 226 off Lyon, in just 85 balls.

Could Xavier Doherty be Australia's answer to Monty Panesar? © Getty Images
Australia have the option of playing left-arm spinner Xavier Doherty at Hyderabad. The 30-year-old had bowled decently in one of the the tour games, when he took three for 108 from 24 overs. However, the million dollar question beaming in front of Australia is who to drop if Doherty has to come in. Peter Siddle, the most experienced of the lot, and a fit James Pattinson, who took six wickets in the first Test, select themselves. All-rounder Moises Henriques had a stellar debut with the bat (68 and 81 not out), even though he could not inflict too much damage with the ball. So, the only viable option would seem Mitchell Starc. 

In the post-match presser, Clarke refused to be drawn into the debate whether Australia had made a mistake by choosing a pace-heavy attack and said better bowling performances from those selected could have helped Australia avoid defeat.

"Australian spin took three wickets in the first innings, fast bowling took a lot more," Clarke said. "That doesn't mean to say that playing three fast bowlers and a medium-pace all-rounder, we got that right. We need to assess, we need to look at conditions again and work out what we think is the best XI [in Hyderabad]. It's not just about selection, it's about how you perform, I don't think we bowled well enough in our first innings and we certainly didn't bat well enough in our second innings.

"We are not India. We are a different team, we have different fast bowlers to the Indian fast bowlers and we have different spinners to the Indian spinners," he added.

Point taken, Michael, but at this juncture, with the way India exploited the spin-friendly wicket in the first Test, it would augur well for Australia if they play the extra spinner. Even though Doherty may not be a Monty Panesar, it would be a fruitless task, as they experienced in the first match, to try and take the majority of 20 wickets with pace on the dust bowls that are likely to be served wherever they go.

(This article first appeared here)

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

India A vs England: Tiwary steals the show on Day One



Manoj Tiwary scored a defiant 93 to guide India A to a competent 369 for nine at stumps on Day One of the first three-day warm-up match of England's tour of India at the Cricket Club of India (CCI), Mumbai.

26-year-old Tiwary, who has always been on the sidelines for a Test spot, gave the Indian selectors a right dilemma in a match that was billed as a slugfest between captain Suresh Raina and Yuvraj Singh for the coveted no 6 spot. The Bengal lad shared a 110-run seventh-wicket partnership with all-rounder Irfan Pathan (46) in the third session to wrest back the advantage from the visitors.

Earlier, England were asked to bowl by Raina on what seemed like a sporting wicket ahead of the day's play.The tourists, who started with three quicks (James Anderson, Steve Finn and Tim Bresnan) were left in a spot soon in the first session after Steve Finn hobbled off the field after bowling just four overs. However, the Englishmen made the most of their bowling arsenal and picked up wickets at regular intervals, two per session, even as the track lost its nip, to restrict India A to 224 for six at Tea. This, after Abhinav Mukund (73) and Yuvraj Singh (59) shared a 56-run third-wicket partnership following the early dismissals of  Murali Vijay (7) and Ajinkya Rahane (4). 

While Mukund was edgy to begin with before eventually settling into his 83-ball 73 (16 x4), Singh was merciless after being dropped first ball by Ian Bell. The southpaw greeted Samit Patel into the attack with two fours and a straight-lofted six, before bringing up his 50 with a similar maximum. The crack off Singh's bat as he found the sweet spot again-and-again was music to the ears of the crowd swelling by the hour at the Brabourne Stadium. In the 43rd over, Singh decided to have a change of angles and lofted Graeme Swann (23-6-90-3) over the long-on fence before being stumped two balls later.

Raina and keeper Wriddhiman Saha did not trouble the selectors much after being dismissed for 20 each to leave India A reeling at 190 for six in 47 overs. England would have expected a few overs of batting at this point on Day One, but Tiwary and Pathan had other plans.

The duo paced their innings well, clearing the fence 19 times in their 110-run stand and wrested control from the Englishmen. Tiwary was fluid with his strokeplay and seemed in no hurry to get going. The Bengal lad caressed the balls to the boundary, rather than heaving them and scored with a modest strike rate of around 60. Pathan (46, 83b, 5x4, 2x6), always the slugger, was also uncharacteristically patient with his innings and only punished the looseners. The left-hander was eventually to be trapped in front by Swann in the 75th over. The dismissal, however, wasn't to deter Tiwary as he carried on fighting and fending the English quicks into the nineties.

India A had been let down by batsmen who couldn't convert their starts into big scores and here was a man on the brink of three figures who knew that, in all probability, he still might not get that elusive Test cap. However, Tiwary's Terrific Tuesday was not to get the icing it deserved as Tim Bresnan (20-6-59-3) uprooted the former's middle stumps with four overs left in the day's play.

Tiwary might be the hero on paper, but the star of the day, at least for the 500-odd spectators in the North stand, was comeback-king Kevin Pietersen. The swashbuckling batsman, who made a return to the England squad following an autumn of controversy, evoked loud cheers from the crowd as he placed himself at mid-on and deep midwicket during the third session. Pietersen rewarded his fans, both Indian and English, with a few quick waves and even snuck in an over that went for seven runs.

At the end, both teams would be happy with their efforts. India A will hope to get as close to 400 as possible with Vinay Kumar (25*) and Parvinder Awana (11*) hoping to extend their 22-run last-wicket partnership. England, on the other hand, will look to complete their bowling formalities as soon as possible Wednesday morning and exploit Brabourne's small boundaries on a now flat batting track.

Brief scores: India A 369-9 in 90 overs (Manoj Tiwary 93, Abhinav Mukund 73; Tim Bresnan 3-59, Graeme Swann 3-90) vs England.

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Lights, Camera, Punches!


Founder chairmen of SFL: Raj Kundra and Sanjay Dutt (Pic Courtesy: www.asportsnews.com)
The Mumbai home of the Super Fight League (SFL), advertised as India’s only professional Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) organization, is an arena in a dark, dingy building hidden somewhere in the suburb of Saki Naka. The arena, located on the third floor of this building, is accessed by what looks like a 50-year-old elevator and a staircase that is littered with cigarette butts, wrappers, boxes and other paraphernalia. The smell of smoke is evident as you approach the arena, not knowing what to expect inside.

But that’s the beauty of MMA, isn’t it? It’s not football, it’s not followed by millions. It’s not something a kid will tell his parents he is following. It has its loyal base of followers who keep the sport confined to dingy arenas, basements and car-parks. Originally promoted as a martial arts competition with the intention of finding the most effective ways of unarmed combat, fighters are pitted against each other with minimal rules. As the sport grew, fighters employed multiple martial arts into their style, such as Muay Thai, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ), Wushu and Shotokan Karate. It finally got mainstream acceptance with movies such as Never Back Down and Fight Club; and it’s finally made its way to India via the SFL.

It is said that marshal arts originated in India thousands of years ago in the akharas of North India where pehelwaans grappled with each other in the mud. The sport, along with other forms of Indian martial arts like Kalarippayattu was supposedly taken to the East along with the Buddhist culture where it was modified and excelled at. In India, however, the sport remained restricted to the akharas. “It is rather ironic,” says Kaushik Sen, a 35-year-old bantamweight participant of the SFL, “that the MMA scene in India has just been born. Even though martial arts originated in India, at the end of the day we are a peaceful and docile culture. We’re not a fighting kind of people.” 

That being said, the scene inside the SFL arena gives a lot of hope for the sport in India. Sure, it’s got its glitz and glamour with white, skimpily clad girls dancing away to the IPL tune during the breaks and participants entering the arena dressed like The Prince of Persia, but the quality of the fights inside the caged ring show that the sport is picking up. Raj Kundra, founder chairman of SFL, is excited and claims that SFL has caught the attention of the international audience. “From six months we’ve gone from people laughing at how amateur we were to international fighters tweeting to me that MMA has arrived in India and the quality of your guys is now up there. There are 3000 MMA organizations in the world; we’re the only one to deliver weekly fights all year round,” he says.

Kultar Singh Gill, a fighter in the main event of the evening—a welterweight bout against Egypt’s Amir Wahman—believes that the sport is bound to spread in India. “Aag jaise failegi (It will spread like fire),” he says. “Just wait and watch!” Sen, sporting a giant bruise under his left eye after losing to a 19-year-old in the only bout (out of seven) that lasted all three rounds, agrees: It (MMA) has a fantastic future in India. It’s already exploded in the West and now, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) — which is the largest MMA promotion company in the world — is coming to India.”

Sen, who has been fighting since 2004, believes that MMA is an “excellent form of self-defense” and encourages women to learn it. “It should be made mandatory for women; it’s the best way to protect yourself on the street.” Sen plans to open a school in Delhi soon. “I want to become an MMA teacher. Delhi needs a (MMA) school. Me and Ricky, my corner man, are going to open something up,” he says.

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

From Punk to Paragon (Book Review: Open by Andre Agassi)


When Dr Manmohan Singh took over as Prime Minister of India in 2004, of the many things he spoke of in his first press conference, one line stuck out. “Life is never free of contradictions,” said Dr Singh, about the Congress’ association with the Left parties in spite of many policy differences. While the thinking man’s prime minister was making a political analogy, almost 15,000 kilometres away, a 34-year-old tennis player’s life was a living example of the maxim. Andre Kirk Agassi’s journey was all about contradictions, and that’s what the eight-time Grand Slam champion writes about in his thoroughly engaging, unputdownable autobiography—Open.

The book, superbly ghost-written by Pulitzer prize-winning author J.R. Moehringer, follows the journey of a ninth-grade dropout who’s proudest accomplishment—in a celebrity life full of silverware and moolah— is a school he builds for underprivileged children. “Life is a tennis match between polar opposites,” says Agassi. “Winning and losing, love and hate, open and closed.” Agassi looks at his whole life through the lenses of contradiction. “Do I contradict myself? Very well, then, I contradict myself,” he quotes from Walt Whitman’s Song of Myself. Agassi is proud of who he is as a human being; he is proud of his life, even if it is flawed and imperfect.

Now, one can’t quite imagine Andre Agassi’s life to be flawed and imperfect, right? After all, he is a man who has won 869 tennis matches in a 21-year pro career. He has won 60 career titles including eight Grand Slams and the Golden Slam—all four Grand Slams plus the Olympic Gold Medal. He has dated and married two of the most beautiful and successful women in the world, Brooke Shields and Steffi Graf, eventually settling down and having kids with the latter. Isn’t that a fairy-tale life?

Not really.

Through Open, Agassi in-depthly describes how his whole life is anything but a fairy tale and revolves around one grand, shocking truth. “I hate tennis,” says Agassi, repeatedly throughout the book. When a number of people he tells this to do not believe him, he stresses, “I really do (hate it).” Why? “(Because) I’m not suited for anything else. I don’t know how to do anything else. Tennis is the only thing I’m qualified for. Also, my father would have a fit if I did anything different.”

Agassi’s flashback begins with his childhood home in the middle of the Las Vegas desert and how he went from the crib right on to a tennis court built in his backyard by a domineering, “fire-belching” father who wanted him to be number one in the world someday. Agassi himself had no such ambitions and says that he craved to be a normal kid and do normal kiddy stuff. But instead of action figures and Lego, Agassi’s only toy was a ball machine—christened “The Dragon”—which was modified by his father to continuously shoot balls at 110 miles per hour. When he describes the machine, you can’t help but feel that it is the seven-year-old Agassi talking. “Midnight black, set on big rubber wheels...the dragon has a brain, a will, a black heart—and a horrifying voice. Sucking another ball into its belly, the dragon makes a series of sickening sounds. As pressure builds inside its throat, it groans. As the ball rises slowly to its mouth, it shrieks. For a moment the dragon sounds almost silly, but when it takes dead aim at me and fires a ball 100 miles an hour, the sound it makes is a bloodcurdling roar. I flinch every time.”

Agassi describes how his seven-year-old self was made to hit almost 2500 balls per day and given a target of hitting a million balls-a-year by his father. At age 13, he is booted off to the Nick Bollettieri Tennis Academy in order to “eat, sleep and drink tennis”. It is here that Agassi becomes a rebel, drops out of school at age 14 and builds his “punk” image that he was infamous for in his early pro career. Agassi talks of his pink-mohawk look and his denim shorts and how sportswriters “murdered” him for it, branding him a “punk” who’s trying to get noticed. But Agassi explains how he wanted anything but be noticed.  He says, “They (sportswriters) say I’m trying to change the game. In fact I’m trying to prevent the game from changing me. They call me a rebel, but I have no interest in being a rebel, I’m only conducting an everyday, run-of-the-mill teenage rebellion...I’m doing nothing more than I did at the Bollettiery Academy. Bucking authority, experimenting with identity, sending a message to my father, thrashing against the lack of choice in my life.”

It is from this point that Agassi starts to accept who he is and what his life is and begins to see things in the positive. He begins to tell reporters not what he actually thinks but “what they seem to want to hear” him say. He talks of how humbled he is with his growing popularity and how fans finally accept his “punk” image and begin to dress like him. He talks of how flattered, yet confused, he is with people wanting to be like him. “I can’t imagine all these people trying to be like Andre Agassi, since I don’t want to be Andre Agassi,” he says.

Aside from the fact that he actually hates tennis, Agassi also brings forth some other scandalous revelations that he had hidden from the public his entire career: like his falling hair and use of a hairpiece in the early nineties and how he was so terrified of it falling off on court that he lost his first Grand Slam final due to his consciousness; the reasons behind his mid-career downfall,  how he took to crystal meth to get out of depression and lied to the authorities to escape suspension; the infamous “Image is Everything” advertising campaign in which Canon duped him into using his rebel image to sell their products. In a way, Agassi pleads with his readers to recognise that he wasn’t indeed the “enfant terrible” that he was projected to be in the first half of his career; that he was just a guy who was finding it difficult trying to figure out his own identity; that he was just human.

Talking of his plummet during the 1997 season and his resolution to “change” thereafter, Agassi gives a valuable lesson on how to stop feeling sorry for yourself and get on with it. He says, “I tell myself, So what if you hate tennis? Who cares? All those people out there, all those millions who hate what they do for a living, they do it anyway. Maybe doing what you hate, doing it well and cheerfully is the point. Hate it all you want. You still need to respect it—and yourself.”

Agassi is very careful to make sure that Open doesn’t come across as an anti-sports book and gives sports fans their due. He summarises several of his memorable clashes and even gives a ball-by-ball account of the best. He talks of his rivalry with contemporaries such as Boris Becker and Pete Sampras and how thrilled he was at upstaging the latter for the world number one ranking. His description of “The Summer of Revenge” in which he vows to defeat Becker for some unflattering comments made about him by the latter is surreal. The passion and desire to win is apparent in Agassi’s gripping description of these matches and brings out another contradiction in his life: how he hates tennis but hates to lose more. He wants to win: at times for his loved ones and sometimes just for himself.

Agassi surprises many by revealing how jealous he is of Sampras: not for the Californian’s greater number of titles, but for his apparent “lack of need for inspiration”, for his suave image compared to his own brash one. He also talks of how he evolves during the second half of his career, from a tennis player to a father and family man. “Many people benefit from every tennis ball I hit,” he says, explaining why he keeps on going. “I play and I keep playing because I choose to play. Even if it’s not your ideal life, you can always choose it. No matter what your life is, choosing it changes everything… I’m a father first, a tennis player second, and this evolution happens without my being aware.”

Agassi’s relationships with people, whether they are his immediate family or his extended—comprising of his trainers, coaches, managers and even tournament officials—is a lesson in life for upcoming players. Deprived of a proper father figure in his early life, Agassi’s account of his everlasting relationships with multiple father figures is touching and engaging.

Overall, Open is a beautifully choreographed memoir of someone whose life was scripted out for him even before he was born. Andre Agassi is your classic deer caught in the headlights; a grilled-from-birth perfectionist who hated doing something he excelled at. It is an exquisitely penned journey of a young-dropout-rebel-turned-educator; the journey, as tennis historian Bud Collins rightly termed, “from punk to paragon”.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

The Forgotten Voice of Indian Cricket

On an overcast, gloomy evening dated July 18, 2012, as the entire nation mourned the death of "Bollywood's first superstar" Rajesh Khanna, another former superstar - albeit belonging to a different field -  silently passed away in a South Mumbai hospital, unnoticed.

Suresh Saraiya, who celebrated his 76th birthday exactly a month ago on June 20, was the person who is arguably partly responsible for the craze and frenzy that is cricket in India. A cricket commentator for the All India Radio (AIR) and other broadcasters for more than four decades, Suresh bhai - as he was popularly known as - used to be the only source of live cricket coverage for the country before the television era. People in local trains, children huddled up on the last bench in schools and office-goers gathered together in the loo - all used to stick their ears to their transistors and radios in order not to miss Suresh bhai's ball-by-ball commentary.

As the television era beckoned, Saraiya - who also worked as the Public Relations Officer (PRO) for the Central Bank of India for 33 long years - silently faded away. It is rather coincidental that Khanna too - being the heartthrob that he was in the 1960s and 70s -  had receded from the limelight as the years went by.

Thus, it was rather lamentable that while the entire city of Mumbai braved the monsoon rains on July 19 and walked along with their beloved icon Rajesh Khanna's body to perform his last rites - telecast throughout the day by news channels - Suresh Saraiya's funeral the next day at the Chandanwadi electric crematorium at Marine Lines attracted just about 50 people, most of which were family, friends and colleagues.

The procession began at 9am at the crematorium. Saraiya's body - cloaked in white - was placed on a platform at the north end of a 15x10 feet room. The guests were seated on chairs facing the platform. Family members were seen huddled together - some in tears - in front. Saraiya's only daughter Neeta, however, was sitting relatively at the back with her husband Andrew. As guests entered and paid their condolences to her, she often could not control her tears as her husband comforted her. The somber atmosphere was reflected by the ambience of the room. The gloomy weather was exaggerated by multiple chips on the walls, a few dysfunctional tube lights and the sound of hammering nails in the background.

Once the pooja was over, friends and colleagues came up to deliver their eulogies. Harsha Bhogle, renowned cricket commentator and former colleague of Saraiya's, refused to be distressed by the occasion. "I have all happy memories associated with Suresh bhai; how to mourn?" he asked, before recounting his wonderful days in the commentary box with Saraiya. "He used to call me 'mota bhai' (elder brother in Gujarati) even though I was younger to him and was always dressed in a suit and tie. He often berated me for not wearing a tie." Bhogle, in an obituary written for Cricinfo, had described how he always got Saraiya a tie whenever he went on an overseas tour without the latter. However, after returning from India's tour to Australia earlier this year, he had forgotten to give Saraiya the tie. Thus, after trying hard not to mourn, Bhogle could not hold back his tears as he placed the new tie among the garlands on Saraiya's body. "Cricket was his life," he said, emotionally.

Raju Bharatan, another veteran commentator and former colleague of Saraiya's, concurred with Bhogle. "He (Saraiya) died in his commentating boots. He had such a thirst for the game that death alone could quench it," he said.

Also present was the BCCI's chief administrative officer, Ratnakar Shetty, who described Saraiya as one of the most popular voices of the AIR. "What was amazing was his dedication to his job and his humbleness. He had no air of his status," he said.

Former India cricketer Vinod Kambli also paid his respects and reminisced about the tours he went on with Saraiya in 1993-94, and described his death as a big loss.

Other colleagues from his commentary days as well as Cental Bank of India employees talked of how cricket was his oxygen and how, for the last five years of his life, Saraiya expected a call from AIR asking him to resume his commentary duties.

One former colleague hit the bullseye when he lamented how the entire country went into hysteria when Sachin Tendulkar hit a ton of tons, but conveniently missed the stat that Suresh bhai had covered all of 102 Test matches and 149 one-day internationals (ODIs). This very  Suresh bhai was once quoted saying, "I plan to exit (commentary) simultaneously with Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar whenever the Master Blaster calls it a day."

Following the eulogies, Saraiya's body was lifted and carried to the electric furnace to complete the journey back to his creator. While some of the guests dispersed soon after offering their condolences to the family again, some close friends and colleagues stayed behind reminiscing their time spent with Saraiya. One couldn't help but rue that Suresh bhai would never again utter his trademark phrase - "Back again!"

Monday, July 16, 2012

‘I would love to play the IPL’: Nari Contractor


Former India captain and opening batsman, Nari Contractor, at his home in Colaba, Mumbai. Contractor was recently appointed as the chairman of the Cricket Improvement Committee (CIC) of the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA).

At a time when the anti-IPL sentiment is rife with the who’s who of the cricketing world questioning the BCCI’s motives and financial clout, former India captain and opening batsman Nari Contractor strikes a balanced pose—reminiscent of those taken while executing one of his sublime shots—and says he would have loved to play in the tournament in his hay days, albeit unsure whether his style would suit the format!

Nariman Jamshedji Contractor, 78, leans back into the couch at his Cusrow Baug home at Colaba, Mumbai, as the Indian Premier League (IPL) comes into the conversation. A yellow Labrador, Contractor’s pet, paws at the door separating the living room from the kitchen, as a car passes by the window and zips across the narrow lane of the baug. As if on cue, Contractor smiles and shoots, “The IPL is very good for promoting the game. It gets in a lot of money.”

Nari Contractor is a man who plied his trade in the fifties, sixties and seventies—when Test Cricket was bread and butter for cricketers. So, fathoming such a response from him was difficult. However, he isn’t done and goes on to even credit the cash-rich tournament with the revival of fading interest in the game. “In the seventies, when the first One-Day Internationals (ODIs) were played, they were responsible for reviving the interest in the game. The next big step was the IPL, on which it (the sport) is thriving. It is also very good from the entertainment point of view, compared to Test cricket.”

Contractor would know entertainment from not, since he began providing it right from his first competitive game. “It was more of a coincidence than anything”, he says, of the fortuitous beginning to his first-class career.

In February, 1952, an Indian team was to tour the West Indies. In those days, Bombay (now Mumbai) had quite a few Test players; only four or five players would come from other states, according to Contractor. So when the Indian team was to leave for the Caribbean, the erstwhile Bombay Cricket Association had to fill up the vacant spots in the team. Hence, they conducted some local matches, which Contractor contested. In the same year, a Pakistan team was to tour India in the winter. So the Bombay Cricket Association said that they would select four youngsters, based on the performances in these matches, who would play in the Pakistan series.

Contractor reminisces, “One gentleman was watching the matches at the Cricket Club of India (CCI), Mumbai. During the course of one of the matches, he called on me and asked me to play for Gujarat, since I was born there. But I was sure that I would get into the national side after these matches, so I turned down his offer. He wished me the best and reiterated that I should play for Gujarat. It was only later that I came to know that this man was Phiroz Khambata—the captain of the Gujarat team. Later, when the team for the Pakistan series was announced, my name wasn’t on it.” Contractor happened to score 250 at an inter-college match that very day.

Later that evening, taking a chance, he sent a telegram to Khambata saying ‘Available for selection’. “The next morning, when I checked the paper to see the Gujarat team, my name wasn’t there, naturally, as the team was selected the previous evening itself,” he recounts. Little did he know that fate was to take another turn for the better. “However, after two days, I got a telegram saying ‘Proceed to Baroda’. On the day of the match, when the playing XI were announced, my name was last on the list; Mr Khambata had injured himself.” Contractor went on to score a century in each innings of his debut first-class match, which is a world record he shares with fellow left-hand opening bat Arthur Morris. “Maybe God wanted it to happen, I don’t know,” is his reaction to the fateful turn of events.

Contractor wouldn’t even have been eligible to play for Gujarat if he wasn’t born there. He was born in Godhra in the year 1934, but his family immediately shifted to Bombay. Little Nari took to sports like a bear to honey at a young age. After playing cricket and hockey for a prolonged period, the southpaw was finally attracted to the cricketing willow.

Having begun his competitive career batting in the middle order, Contractor opened the innings for the first time only in 1955. Before the New Zealand series of ’55 (where he made his Test debut for India), there was a practice match—West Zone vs. New Zealand—where he opened the innings with Vinoo Mankad. But when he was selected in the Indian team (for the ensuing Tests against the Kiwis), he batted at no. 6 in the first Test. “However, in the second Test at Delhi, Vinoo couldn’t make it for the match and there was no other opening batsman (to replace him). So, Polly (Umrigar, the captain) said that I should open. I did, and scored 61.”

Contractor was clearly enjoying talking about his Test career, even about instances which would unsettle the best of sportsmen. In the Lords Test match of the 1959 tour to England, speedster Brian Statham all but shattered Contractor’s ribs when the latter was on nought. “There was a ridge on the pitch at Lords,” he explains. “Thus, when the delivery hit the ridge, it flew. There was no chance of avoiding it. I fell on the ground and it was difficult to breathe. So, I told Polly that I can’t play. But he asked me to continue for two-three overs and see how it feels before making a decision. But in the next three overs, we lost two quick wickets. So, I had no choice but to stay at the crease. I only got to know at lunch time that I had fractured four ribs.” Contractor ended up scoring 81 with those four fractured ribs, and understandably describes it as an innings which is “special” to him. “But there were others too like my hundred against the West Indies in 1957-58 in Ahmedabad. I was also the top scorer in the match vs Australia at Kanpur in 1960, which we won.” He also rates Statham as one of the best bowlers he has faced. “He (Statham) was very accurate. He moved the ball well and at a good pace.”

Contractor would soon get the captaincy of the Indian team, making him their youngest ever captain (aged 26) at the time. Talking of how he got it, he says, “During the West Indies’ tour to India in 1958-59, we had Ghulam Ahmed, Vinoo Mankad, Hemu Adhikari and Polly Umrigar as captains. After that, we toured England in 1959 where Datta Gaekwad and Pankaj Roy, both, were captains. So, we had six captains in a period of few games. After that, the selectors decided that I was the future, so I was made captain for the Pakistan series (of 1960-61).”

Contractor’s stint as captain, however, was short-lived. The infamous, near-fatal incident of the 1961-62 West Indies tour where a towering Charlie Griffith rammed a bouncer into Contractor’s skull, leaving the latter unconscious for six days is, even today, one of the first things that come to mind when you think of Nari Contractor. He would never play for India again.

However, the remarkable matter-of-factness in Contractor’s tone when asked if he regretted the incident is inspiring. “What is there to regret?” he asks. “When you play a game like cricket, injuries are bound to happen. A fast bowler can try to hit you at will. But to hit you on this spot (pointing to his temple), is completely accidental.” Perhaps so, but this was a 90 degrees hit at more than 90mph on the most tender part of the brain. “Everybody gets hit, there is nothing new in that,” is the cool reply.

If this pragmatic response is inspiring, wait till you hear about the comeback. After getting his skull shattered in March, Contractor’s last operation was in July. A metallic sheet was inserted into his skull. Contractor recounts an amusing, but life-changing conversation with his doctor—Dr Chandy—who asked him “the most ridiculous question he could” - ‘When are you starting to play Cricket again?’

“It was another bouncer to me!” says Contractor animatedly. “My vision had gone for a toss and everything was a blur. I can’t see a bloody thing! And this man is asking me to play first-class cricket!” Contractor had then replied that he probably would never play the game again. What Dr Chandy would advise Contractor would stick with him for the rest of his life. He says, “The doctor gave me the best piece of advice that has ever been given to me. He said, ‘Look, if you want to be a normal human being again, the first thing you have to do is start training and play the game again. Otherwise, you will be a vegetable.’” Dr Chandy’s words were so strong and inspirational that Contractor was back playing for Gujarat within a year.

Even though Contractor never got a second chance to play for India again, it did seem like it was the country’s loss. He made 2,535 runs in the second half of his career. His first-class average between 1962-63 and 1970-71 was 38.40, just a shade below 40.50—which was his average prior to the freak incident.
Contractor loved his cricket. He once famously said in an interview – “Cricket has given me everything but money!” However, he warns that this must not be construed in the negative. He has no regrets of playing in an era where you got paid just Rs 250 per match, compared to the lakhs you get now. “We used to live more out of pocket, than in pocket,” he quips. “But it was fun! If I was asked to live my life again, I would live the same life,” he adds with a nostalgic smile.

So, it does come as a shock when Contractor bats for the IPL (read: the shorter format of the game). However, he does question whether the tournament and the format are good for the game from a technical aspect. “I do not know. Today, all Test matches finish within three-four days. Earlier, there were hardly any results and many matches ended in draws.” But isn’t that a good thing? “In a way, yes, but now everybody is playing ODI and T-20 Cricket in Test matches!” he exclaims, before getting up and taking a batting stance. “Today, you get away with bad habits such as hitting the wrong ball (in limited overs matches),” he says, before impersonating a poke outside off stump. “In the series against Australia earlier this year, 80 percent of the boys got out caught in the slips (playing this shot). In the IPL, it will get you four runs.”

Admitting that the IPL is having a retarding influence on the game from the Test cricket point of view, Contractor goes on to rue the seepage of limited-over cricket shots into the textbook of youngsters practicing the game. He recounts one particular incident when he used to coach at the CCI a few years back. Contractor was overlooking a young boy (aged 11-12) batting at the nets. The boy played a reverse sweep, to which Contractor remarked, “What the bloody hell are you doing?” The boy, clearly perplexed, replied, “But I played a perfect shot, sir!” Contractor laughs and says, “Now, what do I coach him? He has played the perfect shot!” adding, “Coaching is a misnomer today. How will you coach a boy? How can you stop him from playing the shot? How do you make him understand that you cannot succeed every time you play that shot?” It is then that Contractor admits that, “T-20 is a negative format. It doesn’t produce the top level of cricket, i.e. Test cricket.” He adds that if the country wants to produce more Tendulkars and Dravids, kids upto the age of 16 should strictly be taught “the correct format”.

However, being the definition of pragmatism, Contractor also points out that the IPL and T-20 are the “basic survival of cricket” due to the monetary benefits. “How can you not concentrate on them?” he asks. When asked if he would have played in the IPL if given the chance, Contractor laughs and quips, “I would have loved to play in the IPL! But I probably wouldn’t have been good enough to play in it.”

Contractor believes that the money earned by the BCCI through the IPL is going towards the betterment of the game, and also helps spreading it to the nooks and corners of the country. “Earlier, only boys from big cities like Mumbai, Delhi and Madras (Chennai) used to make it to the Indian team. But nowadays, you see boys from places like Jharkhand make it big (a clear reference to Indian captain M.S. Dhoni). Cricket has been spread very beautifully. If the BCCI earns two crores, at least 75 lakhs are spent on cricket.”

Contractor takes the recent example of the BCCI remunerating its former players, including himself, who retired before 2004. “Why did they not give us this money earlier?” he asks, before himself replying, “Because earlier, there was no money! Money started flowing into the BCCI coffers only after 2004.” Contractor believes that sports such as Football and Hockey have also similarly started progressing. “It’s only a matter of time,” he says, before these sports catch up with cricket.

So does Contractor only follow cricket, or is he a total sports buff? “Oh, I follow all sports!” he remarks, adding, “This period from May to August is a real headache!” referring to the various sports tournaments being played—the French Open, the Wimbledon, the Euro, the Olympics and, finally, the US Open. “It’s madness!” he exclaims.

Although coming across as an astute, pragmatic thinker, Nari Contractor is your typical Bambaiya Parsi—fun-loving, jovial and simple to the tee. He walks around the house dressed in the characteristic Parsi loose shirt and trousers, and haggles with the mango-seller like every other Mumbaikar. His simplicity is exemplified by the solitary trophy that adorns the showcase in his living room. In 2007, Contractor was given the CK Nayadu Lifetime Achievement Award by the BCCI—which is the highest honour the board can bestow on a former player. He is unperturbed by the millions of rupees and overflowing cabinets of trophies earned by today’s cricketers. “I earned just about 8000 rupees playing cricket,” he says, with a twinkle in his eyes.

Knowing him, he wouldn’t have asked for a paisa more.